TradeRadarNews Australia
    Home/News/Crypto/Bitcoin, Ethereum-linked protocols lose $35 million in multiple attacks hours apart
    Crypto
    23 Jul 2026, 08:00

    Bitcoin, Ethereum-linked protocols lose $35 million in multiple attacks hours apart

    Tech Bitcoin, Ethereum-linked protocols lose $35 million in multiple attacks hours apart The attacks hit Verus, B² Network and other cross-chain syste

    Key Takeaways

    • 1This article covers key developments in the crypto market
    • 2Always verify claims with official ASIC and regulatory sources
    • 3Past performance does not guarantee future results
    • 4Consider speaking to a qualified financial adviser before acting
    • 5TradeRadarNews provides information only — not financial advice
    Bitcoin, Ethereum-linked protocols lose $35 million in multiple attacks hours apart
    Tech Bitcoin, Ethereum-linked protocols lose $35 million in multiple attacks hours apart The attacks hit Verus, B² Network and other cross-chain systems, showing how compromised keys, upgrade powers and validation checks can empty protocols without breaking the underlying cryptography. By Shaurya Malwa | Edited by Omkar Godbole Updated Jul 23, 2026, 7:21 a.m. Published Jul 23, 2026, 6:38 a.m. 4 min read Make preferred on Share Share this article Copy link X icon X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook Email Make preferred on Bitcoin, Ethereum-linked protocols lose $35 million in multiple attacks hours apart. (Mika Baumeister/Unsplash) Summary Show In a six-hour span, at least three crypto bridges and cross-chain protocols were drained of more than $35 million, exposing recurring weaknesses in how these systems are designed and governed. Verus’s Ethereum bridge was exploited for about $7.54 million using the same contract path and bug class as a May hack, underscoring how unresolved flaws and redeposited funds left the system vulnerable to a second drain. The B² Network lost roughly $3.86 million after an attacker seized its staking contract’s upgrade authority, highlighting how compromised keys and permissions — not broken cryptography — remain the primary cause of major crypto thefts as AI-driven intrusion tools grow more capable. Crypto's bridges and cross-chain protocols are having a brutal day, capping an already punishing year . At least three were drained in quick succession over a 6-hour period, for a combined total exceeding $35 million, according to blockchain data analyzed by CoinDesk and reported by security firms BlockAid and PeckShield. The run of attacks shares a common thread that underscores the need to audit off-chain components, such as private keys, not just smart contract code. None broke the underlying cryptography — each was either a logic flaw, where the code ran as written, but the rules still let money out, or a compromised key that handed an attacker control it should never have had. The three exploits The perpetuals exchange AFX lost about $24.15 million from a bridge it runs on Arbitrum. The Verus-Ethereum bridge was drained of $7.54 million, its second hack this year through the same flaw. And B², a Bitcoin scaling network, lost $3.86 million from its token staking contract. The most damning was blockchain network Verus. Blockaid detected an exploit on the Verus-Ethereum bridge early Thursday that drained about $7.54 million in ether, tokenized bitcoin and a spread of stablecoins. 🚨 Blockaid detected a @VerusCoin Ethereum Bridge exploit on Ethereum. An attacker used the bridge import path to trigger unbacked Ethereum-side payouts, draining ~$7.54M in ETH, tBTC, USDC, USDT, EURC, MKR, and scrvUSD from bridge reserves. More details in 🧵 — Blockaid (@blockaid_) July 23, 2026 The firm flagged that the attack reused the same bridge contract and entry path as an earlier hack, exploiting an identical class of bug. CoinDesk reported that earlier incident, an $11.5 million loss , in May. A bridge is a blockchain-based tool that enables assets to move between two networks that otherwise cannot interact. It holds real tokens on one side and issues claims against them on the other, and its safety depends entirely on correctly verifying that every withdrawal is genuinely backed by assets locked on the other chain. The Verus flaw let an attacker trigger payouts on the Ethereum side that were never properly backed on the Verus side, so the bridge released real money against a claim worth almost nothing. The attacker returned most of the funds in exchange for a bounty after the May attack. Verus then redeposited the recovered money into the same bridge on July 8, according to onchain records compiled by security researchers, and the bridge was drained again two weeks later. The cost of that trust is visible in the protocol's own numbers. Verus held close to $100 million in total value locked at the start of 2025, according to DefiLlama . It holds about $9 million as of Thursday, a slow bleed punctuated by a fresh drop this week as the latest hack landed. (Shaurya Malwa/CoinDesk) Such repeated failures do not just cost the money stolen in any single attack, but drain the confidence that keeps assets on the platform at all. Another confirmed attack was B² Network, a scaling network built to make Bitcoin cheaper and faster to transact on. B² said in Asian morning hours Thursday that an attacker gained unauthorized access to the upgrade authority of its token staking contract, the administrative permission that controls how that contract behaves. Security firm Lookonchain traced roughly $3.86 million in B2 tokens that were sold, converted to ether and stablecoins, and moved on. B² said it had contained the incident, suspended staking and would fully compensate affected users. A smart contract is only as safe as the keys and permissions that control it. If an attacker seizes the authority to chang

    📺 Related Videos

    How To Invest In Crypto — Full Beginners Guide

    📺 Brian Jung

    Biggest Crypto Mistakes

    📺 Coin Bureau

    Finance Podcasts

    Written by

    TradeRadarNews Team

    Editorial Team

    Our editorial team covers markets, fintech, and regulatory developments across Australia and globally.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Back to Crypto News

    Risk Warning: Trading and investing carries significant risk. Your investments can fall as well as rise. CFDs carry high risk of rapid loss due to leverage. Cryptocurrency is not ASIC-regulated and not covered by AFCA. This is information only, not financial advice. Seek independent advice before investing.

    We use cookies to improve your experience.